Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Interview with McMenamins' Brewery General Manager Kevin Tillotson

By Angelo M. De Ieso II

Following a modest beginning at Portland’s Barley Mill Pub at the corner of SE 17th Avenue and Hawthorne Boulevard, brothers Mike and Brian McMenamin have expanded their pub operation into more than fifty locations throughout Oregon and Washington. Soonafter the Barley Mill opened, Oregon’s laws changed allowing beer consumption at the same location where it was brewed. In early 1984, McMenamins opened the Hillsdale Brewery & Public House in southwest Portland making it Oregon’s first brewpub.

Today McMenamins is known for its acclaimed theatre-pubs, historical preservations, and decorative lodging sites. Further, the company has expanded its operations to making wine and distilling spirits. But what about the beer? With so many microbreweries popping up in the corner of the Pacific Northwest often referred to as “Beervana”, what is McMenamins’ means of keeping up with such a competitive marketplace where independence and innovation thrive? I spoke with the brewery’s general manager, Kevin Tillotson to find out.

McMenamins appears to be a continually growing company. How did elements such as the distilleries and wineries come about? Have you guys been brewing beer longer than distilling/winemaking?


Kevin Tillotson:
We've been brewing beer since October of 1985. So it has been a part of our business model pretty much since the get go.

The winery and distillery seem like a natural progression for us. I think Mike McMenamin had probably been interested in doing a winery from the outset but it wasn't until the Edgefield property was secured in 1990 that we got the winery on track. Edgefield had lots of space, space which afforded us the first realistic opportunity for a full-scale wine making operation. You have to remember that wine making (as well as distilling) presents major challenges in the way of long term barrel storage. So neither operation was something that could realistically been pulled off in one of our smaller locations.

The distillery actually wasn't fired-up until 1998. Mike McMenamin had located an old 65-gallon Holstein pot still, and there was a building on the Edgefield complex that had served as a storage facility for root vegetables back in the poor farm days. Now it's a distillery and a bar and serves as the launching point for golfers playing our pub course.


How did standard brews such as the Ruby, Terminator, Hammerhead, etc become regulars for McMenamins? What does it take for a beer at McMenamins to be a “standard” beer?

KT: Our three flagship ales -- Ruby, Terminator and Hammerhead -- were all developed very early on at our first brewery (The Hillsdale Brewery & Public House). They were put into regular production there, and one thing lead to another. As we added more breweries and pubs to the mix Ruby, Terminator and Hammerhead were always available. They are the three most recognized McMenamins beers and people get cranky if they aren't available. Hammerhead currently accounts for 26% of our total production, which is astonishing to me, especially considering the number of unique recipes created within the McMenamins network of breweries every year.

The idea behind offering "standard" beer is, I suppose, an attempt to present a consistent and recognizable product at all of our locations for people who appreciate that kind of dependability in their beverage choices. Beers that have become McMenamin "company standards" are really just recipes that became very popular over the years, and because they were made with a degree of regularity people came to expect to see them in our places. To my knowledge no brewer for McMenamins has ever sat down and said "I will now design the next 'company standard'". They just sort of evolved behind their own energy. Clever marketing minds probably don't like to hear it but the truly great beers have a way of creating their own enduring legend, which in turn creates staying power.

Can you tell me more about McMenamins' use of "green energy"? To what capacity do you employ this?

KT: McMenamins brews all of our beer using green (renewable) energy. We know the total beer production we do company-wide, and we know how much energy is involved in the process of making a keg of beer since two of our breweries have their own power meters. The power usage therefore includes all power used in the brewery, from the operation of pumps and other equipment down to the lighting in the brewery itself. Based on that information, McMenamins pays a higher rate to purchase the amount of green energy needed to match our company-wide beer production. Obviously there is no way that you can specify the type of energy that is supplied to a particular location, power from every source goes into the same grid that everyone uses. But we pay a higher rate for the energy, and the extra money PGE collects is directly invested in renewable energy development, primarily wind power turbines.

We started out just using the green energy credit model for the production of our seasonal beers a couple years ago, but as of August 2006 we decided to make a full commitment to include all of the beer we produce.



Can you tell me more about the McMenamins’ Barley Cup competition?

KT: The Barley Cup brew Festival is held at the Thompson Brewery & Public House every year. McMenamins has a number of brew fests every year.

The description for the Barley Cup: “McMenamins breweries compete for the coveted Barley Cup by brewing a randomly drawn brew style, ensuring a full range of beers for you to choose from. The overall winner of the Barley Cup trophy, determined by The Capital City Homebrewers Club, will go on to represent McMenamins at the Holiday Ale Festival in Portland. Meanwhile, patrons choose the winner of the "People's Choice" award.”

Note: For more information on McMenamins’ festivals and brewing competitions, visit:
www.mcmenamins.com/index.php?loc=75&id=421"


Some beer snobs might think some McMenamins beers to be less adventurous than others. What does your organization do to challenge the brewers and what do the brewers do to challenge them in creating seasonals and test market new beers?

KF: Let me put it this way: We brew in small batches (6 barrels/12 kegs - with the lone exception of Edgefield), which allows our brewers to collectively create well over two hundred unique recipes every year. McMenamins has from the beginning had at its core a philosophy of creativity and experimentation — and to that end, we’ve had some fabulous successes as well a few unbelievable disasters. It’s all part of the package. You can’t be afraid to try something. At least once anyway. While it is true that as the company has matured we’ve tempered the recklessness of some of our earlier experiments, I still find our brewers are constantly pushing the envelope. I’m amazed at some of the recipes I come across when visiting our places.

My experience has been that most brewers don’t need any additional prodding from ‘the suits upstairs’ to be experimental in their approach to recipe design. That curiosity about ingredients and style are part of what makes a brewer a brewer. McMenamin brewers do have to work within some parameters, and need to communicate their ideas with brewery managers before production begins. But for the most part that process is a mere formality to make sure someone isn’t doing something foolish, dangerous or illegal.

As to the opinions of ‘beer snobs’ as you refer to them — to be truthful I don’t think any of us pays attention to that sort of stuff. ‘Snob’ as it is defined infers some sort of cultural elitism that isn’t particularly relevant to the pub business, as I understand it. The good pubs seem to me to be pretty blue-collar, all-inclusive environments. It is indeed true that there are a number of enthusiasts around who very much enjoy the sensory process involved in categorizing and rating things to fully realize their personal beer or wine or coffee drinking experience. But to be honest the vast majority of beer drinkers aren’t concerned with breaking things down to anywhere near that degree. They pull up to the bar, order a beer, and talk to their friends about the day’s news. The main thing most of these beer drinkers are looking for is a high degree of satisfaction out of their chosen product. ‘Are the finish hops aromatic enough in this IPA?’ ‘Is the porter as flavorful as the last batch?’ ‘Is this keg of Hammerhead still a little green?’ I think we’ve always operated under the assumption that the only beer ‘snobs’ or ‘judges’ you really need to worry about are the ones sitting on the other side of the bar. The folks who pay the heating bill. And you’d better pay real close attention to their opinions if you know what's good for you.

When you get right down to it there's only one reason that anyone should drink any beer, and that's because they enjoy it. The criteria for what makes any given beer enjoyable vary widely from person to person. A ribbon or award is a nifty thing for the brewer that gets it but it doesn’t mean a thing to me as a customer sitting on the other side of the bar deciding what beer I’d like to try. To that end, our most useful feedback always comes from the folks that frequent our neighborhood establishments. It’s a relationship that naturally results when a community comes to feel comfortable, welcome and valued in your brewpub. In all of our places, there are patrons who offer constructive feedback to brewers and pub staff face to face. Trust me, people in this region have fairly sophisticated palates when it comes to microbrews, and are not shy about telling you exactly what they think of your efforts. They also respond when you take their comments to heart and act on their input. Any brewer worth their weight in salt can't help but become a better craftsman under those kind of circumstances.

So the real trick becomes finding the balance. Creativity for creativity’s sake is fine for a home brewer, but the fact of the matter is that we’re ultimately in the business of selling beer. That Blue Ribbon you got for your authentic Belgian Dubbel won’t do too much for you if your customer base isn’t interested in drinking twelve kegs of Belgian Dubbel in a reasonable amount of time. Every McMenamins brewer is familiar with the feeling of delivering a taster of his latest floor-malted masterpiece to a regular customer and getting the dreaded “mmmm, that’s a real delicious Scotch Ale you made here Pete. Now could you pour me another IPA please” response. I’ve worked with a number of brewers over the years who were never quite able to deal with that. It’s a hard lesson to accept, and can be a crushing blow when you’ve really poured your heart into developing a recipe. But understanding and responding to that dynamic is critical to a brewer’s success in this environment. Regardless of how exquisitely made a beer may be, certain styles consistently sell well, and certain styles consistently sit around for a long, long time. And what’s even trickier is that dynamic can change significantly from pub to pub. That’s the reality of the situation. The wise brewer listens to his customers and knows the tastes of his regular clientele and then uses his creative approach to the brewing process to create beers that cater to, and ultimately if they’re doing their job well, further develop those tastes.

So in the end it’s about knowing your crowd and playing the hand you’re holding wisely. Smart craft brewers focus energy on their own strengths. What McMenamins has to offer is a flavorful, locally made alternative. We can do much more experimenting with styles and recipes because we are not restrained by the immense scale of the operations of even some of the larger regional "craft" breweries. My experience has been that people respond very positively to that alternative and creative spirit not just for McMenamins, but in most of the area’s little brewpubs.

What is your bottling situation look like with beers? Any seasonals?

KT: Actually, we don’t bottle any of our seasonals. The only products that McMenamins currently bottles are Hammerhead, Terminator, Ruby and Sunflower IPA. I’m not sure if we’re going to expand on that program any time soon. You can still walk out of any of our establishments with a jar of whatever is on tap.

Bookmark and Share
posted by Angelo De Ieso II @ 1:32 PM   10 comments links to this post

10 Comments:

At 10:33 AM, Anonymous "The Drunken Blog Troll" said...

I can't decide wether to applaud his honesty or say, "If it's all about the money, why don't you start brewing Budmilloor beers and stop producing, 'Experimental beers' that all taste the same or are of low quality." I think the beer business is made up of two different animals:

A. People/Brewers that want to make quality beer to educate the masses and increase everyones beer expectations.

B. Suits/CEO's and other money grubbing bean counters who want to make a buck by selling "Whatever brings home the bacon, the faster way possible."

Which animal do you thing we're describing here?

;-}

 
At 3:02 PM, Anonymous a lover of good beer said...

"The drunken blog troll" apparently missed the point. At no time did Tillotson say it was "all about the money", but rather that McMenamins' approach is an attempt to provide a balance between creative beer making and a quality brand consistency for their regular clientele. Tillotson makes it clear that the brewer can use his creativity to educate by building on his knowledge of his customers' tastes, and that McMenamins' basic philosophy is one of creativity and experimentation. And in "Beervana", a region where beerdrinkers have more exposure to good beer and therefore more refined palates, it makes sense for brewers to welcome input from their customers. Personally, I appreciate the fact that at McMenamins I can find quality beers that provide a range of choices between tried-and-true standards and unique seasonal or specialty beers, and that the proffered selection represents the brewer's best effort and ideas together with an acknowledgment of his customers' taste and preference.

 
At 3:38 PM, Blogger Chris said...

Drunken Troll - I'm not sure whether you're referring to a particular statement made by Tillotson, or to the piece as a whole, so I don't quite know how to respond. I do want to thank you for your input however; varying opinions are what make life (and blogs) more interesting.


Lover of Good Beer - Thanks for the eloquently written defense of McM's.

I freely admit that if given a choice of brewpubs, McM's pubs will always be near the bottom of the list, but this is not to say that they're bad. As you put it, we have exposure and access to hundreds of incredible beers in Portland and for every McM's beer I can think of a handful of other local things I'd prefer to drink.

That being said, if we were anywhere else in the country with a lesser selection I'd probably be ecstatic to have them available.

 
At 11:14 PM, Anonymous Drucken Blog Troll said...

I agree with you Chris... In other parts of the country they would be HAPPY to have a McM... But, here in Beervana, I think they're cutting themselves short.

My opinions come from reading inbetween the lines of his statements...

He makes very obvious statements that McMenamins are NOT brewing for people who serious about quality or cutting edge beers.. He Stated, "As to the opinions of ‘beer snobs’ as you refer to them — to be truthful I don’t think any of us pays attention to that sort of stuff."

Called nuts, but he's saying, "We don;t casr what the quality beer lover want or like..."

Then, there's this statement,"The good pubs seem to me to be pretty blue-collar..." This is not true! Most of the hotel venues are catering to a higher class than the blue coller...People who expect diversity and higher quality.

How about this staement,"My experience has been that most brewers don’t need any additional prodding from ‘the suits upstairs’ to be experimental in their approach to recipe design." This goes to say that NEW recipes have to be screened by the SUITS. Obviously, the reason why you're not seeing any higher gravity styles being produced... Seen any high gravity Scotch ales? Any Imperial IPA's? Old ALes? A Barleywine?

When they hold "festivals or competitions," most are done within the MCM kingdom.

Being that I've worked the brewing business and have worked with the SUITS, I know where he's coming from and know who he's brewing for... WHile he's very elloquant in his desciptions and strokes the interviewer and reader with comments like, "While it is true that as the company has matured we’ve tempered the recklessness of some of our earlier experiments, I still find our brewers are constantly pushing the envelope. I’m amazed at some of the recipes I come across when visiting our places."

What is he ready saying?

We allowed the brewers to be experiemental, but some of those beers didn't sell well, so NOW we've decided to stiffle them and put restraints what they can brew. Reading between the lines, the last sentence means, 'The brewers are being creative within the constraints we put them under."

Consistency has always been a problem with MCM's beers.... One day, Hammerhead is great, the great week it's thin, lifeless and hop less. Why? Inconsiscent brewing methods...sloppy or cutting corners?

"Beer Lover" is partially correct by saying that Portland has population of quality beer drinker. Some are more enthusiastic, than learned beer professionals and judges, but they do have an adcanced palate. That said, McMenamins'never appears on the top of the charts when it comes to QUALITY PORTLAND beer. Nor quality original or inventive menus at the pubs...

In fact, believe it or not, I'm really enjoy going to a McMenamin pub or Hotel or Movie. They have a great groove and ambiance.. That being said, they should have equal quality for they're beer!

This interview pissed me off, because I really feel they don't care about their beer quality or advancement as long as they can sell it and fast.

Anyone who's been to a MCM's pub and has a non-standard brew knows that the "NEW EXPERIMENTAL BEERS" are brewed under a contrant that's pretty heavy.... Wether they call it Nebraska bitter, Hillsdale Pale, Albert's Amber or whatever. The flavor and quality are not a big stretch from the normal standards... A little less hops here and little more Crystal malt there..OH! It's an ESB! Well, maybe, but I think these brewers are capable of more...

BTW, I didn't miss the point.. I didn't read it at face value...I read between the lines of facade.. ;-}

Please, share your thoughts...

 
At 3:15 PM, Anonymous a lover of good beer said...

I think I may have wandered into the wrong forum, and if so, I apologize. Unlike Chris and Drunken Troll, I have not been associated with the beer business – either production or management. (I just like to drink the stuff.) I’m new to this area, and am constantly amazed at the wealth of sensory experience here – from the incredible scenery to the vast array of choices to please one’s palate, whether it be beer, wine, food, coffee, etc. I come from a large metropolitan area, also a beautiful place, but whose gustatory experience, compared to Portland, seems sterile, pasteurized, unsatisfying.

One of the most attractive features of the Portland experience, however, is its unpretentiousness. Good food and drink here doesn’t exist only in dress-up venues, but is available in the most casual of environments. It is so readily available that it has become the norm, the expected. This works beautifully for the community, because good food and drink are accessible by everyone, more people learn to appreciate it and look for it, and the general quality level continues to rise.

Before addressing Drunken Troll’s comments, let me first clarify my perspective. I am not “blue collar”, though I get the sense that Tillotson’s and Troll’s connotations of that term differ considerably. I was particularly put off by Troll’s “higher class than the blue coller” comment, and frankly would probably not appreciate the hotel venues (or Troll’s haunts) if those attitudes prevail there. I am a technical person, decently educated, someone who loves good food and drink, and conviviality, but am not overly excited by technically analyzing what I’ve just ingested – very much a member of that vast majority of beer drinkers referred to by Tillotson. I enjoy exploring new beers, challenging my taste buds, but don’t feel I have to like a particular product just because an expert tells me it’s wonderful.

Frankly, I’m not impressed by what Drunken Troll reads between the lines of Tillotson’s comments, as opposed to what he said. I have admittedly limited experience, and McMenamins may not be on the cutting edge, but what Tillotson said rings true from my own experience there. Troll may have valid arguments about quality of product or even beer marketing philosophy, but he loses credibility by attacking statements that he himself puts in Tillotson’s mouth. When Tillotson says that his brewers are more attuned to the comments of their regular clientele than to ‘beer snobs’, Troll reinterprets this as “we don;t casr what the quality beer lover want or like...". It seems to me there’s room for both kinds of approaches. In another instance, Tillotson’s statement that “we’ve tempered the recklessness of some of our earlier experiments” says to me that unmonitored experiments ended in a bad product, and any company concerned about the quality of its product would try to control that. Troll chooses to extrapolate that to say that the brewers were “stiffled” (sic) because the beers didn’t sell well.

One statement of Troll’s that I agree with is the issue of consistency of McMenamin beers. I would assume, however, that this is a result of brewing in very small batches by multiple brewers (as opposed to the larger scale brewing by single brewers in other local breweries), rather than being “sloppy or cutting corners”.

In each statement of Tillotson’s that Troll takes umbrage with, he in fact assumes the most negative interpretation possible, even to the point of actually changing Tillotson’s words to take on the meaning that he wants to attack. He admits that he “didn't read it at face value...I read between the lines of facade..” His comments are vitriolic to the point that one has to wonder if perhaps he has a personal axe to grind (“Being that I've worked the brewing business and have worked with the SUITS”…). Whatever the case, remanufacturing someone else’s comments seems unproductive.

As I indicated earlier, perhaps this forum is not intended for those of us who are not beer snobs or experts (and those are mutually exclusive terms), in which case I will graciously exit with apologies. As a newbie (and in full disclosure, one who may never learn to enjoy sniffing over my beer), and having enjoyed myself at McMenamin’s, I wandered across the interview and was impressed with Tillotson’s candor and attitude. In any event, thanks for allowing me to participate.

 
At 12:14 AM, Anonymous "The Drunken Blog Troll" said...

Thanks for the rebuttal "good beer."

;-}

 
At 7:02 PM, Blogger Jeff Alworth said...

The McMenamins are so large that they defy most criticisms. In the early days, some of their beers were a bit funky, but for at least a decade they've served clean, fresh ales. My sense is that the breweries brew for the clientele. In the inner, beery core--Kennedy School, Barley Mill, Blue Moon, Mission--the beers are more agressive and interesting. The further away you get, they grow milder.

The first "good" beer I got turned onto was Terminator, and it's still my regular fave. I've found that it's brewed to varying strengths depending on the brewer. Whenever I go--particularly with old-timers--we tend to comment on the nature of the Termie.

Foodies have also long criticized the fare offered at the McPubs, but here again things have improved substantially over the greasy early days. And again, the fare varies depending on the clientele.

I can get a better IPA than the McBrothers', a better stout, a better pale. But they offer me an 80%--80% perfect. In Oregon we can demand more, but it's nothing to sniff at. For me, what makes a McPub is the architecture and ambiance. Their various pubs are among the coolest places to go. When I am considering the Kennedy School versus Laurelwood, I usually opt for Kennedy School. Laurelwood has exceptional beer (90-100% perfect), but the ambiance--drafty, open--can't hold a candle.

We owe a lot to the McBrothers. I'm delighted they exist, and I go regularly. They have their own character, and as many have noted, it's characteristically Portlandish.

(Oh, and I have had a few exceptional beers there. One outstanding regular beer is their Irish or dry stout [names vary]. And every now and again they have a Dubbel on tap, say, and while many may skip it, sometimes these are sublime.)

 
At 7:58 PM, Anonymous Drunken Blog Troll said...

Jeff,

Very diplomatic....

I agree with you on every point! Even the point of Kennedy vs. Laurelwood.

Funny, I bring my kids to Laurelwood and they keep asking why all these kids are misbehaving... Guess I'm old school.... Children should go to a restaurant and have a little respect for other eaters and should learn to behave correctly in a eating establishment...

That said, my kids love Kennedy School, Edgefield, and other MCM's properties....

Getting back to the Tillotson interview..... So far, I see everybody defend the McMenamin's establishments and the quality of the beer. My whole original rant was on Tillotson's words, not the empire in it's self...

I agree.... I like the MCM's properties and have had some decent beers from them...Like Jeff said, 80% there! In fact, maybe that IS my bitch....

McM's are 80% perfect venues... Food is good and comsistent. Yes, I'ma foodie too and would prefer more diversity to the menu....but they are trying to run as Empire... ;-}

I guess I was hoping that Tillotson's attitude was LESS defensive.. It was the longest and most defensive section of the interview. I he did out some nonchalant words towards the beer snobs whioch he could have been, at least diplomatic with and give an answer of encouragement to the beer snobs... Insted he just tosses them aside and sides with the "Milder...Outer fringe (Thanks Jeff!)" as being their SOLE clientele....

So, I have more of a beef with Toll's answers than the empire.. and that's what I was looking for a response too...

I'd like to see McM's be 100% satisfaction and Toll's "SUIT" comcept is to rake in the money and brew whatever will get money in the door... Is this the attitude we want to running all the McM's breweries???

I'm looking for improvment, not defamation...

 
At 9:21 PM, Anonymous Drunkin Blog Troll said...

People... I think these condensending quotes make my beef legitimate. These are in responce to beer snobs evaluating their beer:

"‘Are the finish hops aromatic enough in this IPA?’ ‘Is the porter as flavorful as the last batch?’ ‘Is this keg of Hammerhead still a little green?’ "

Toll's saying this mocking the beer snob...

Here are the BEER truth's. There are written and give profiles for every beer style and there are many different beer styles. WHile no one has to brew to a certain style, if you call a beer an IPA, it should have the basic characteristics of an IPA...

So for his IPA statement...Yes, there should be a notable aromatic hop aroma in an IPA!

He states the quality of the Oregonian beer drinker then insults their intelligence in that statement and the others..

Porter being as flavorful as the last: It's called quality control! If you are producing a product and give it a name...Lets' say, "Budweiser." You are doing a diservice to your drinkin audience and consumers to not have that beer taste the same each and every time....

Hammerhead being a little green: Again, Quality COntrol! "Green" meaning unfinished. Does anyone WANT to drink an unfinished beer? Still sweet with unfermented sugars that give drinker a beer headache and possible an hangover...

I'm just appauled by these statements... If this guy was incharge of your dinner tonight would like to weat a meal that had the wrong amounts of certain ingredients and then served cold?? That's what's Toll's saying is being PICKY of the beer snobs and we're asking to much as Oregonians...

 
At 8:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"green" = young not necessarily unfermented, which mcmenamins did you brew at drunken blog troll? I agree with lover of good beer, you must be a disgruntled Ex, ready to slash tires!

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home